Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 11:20 AM

Subject: CORRECTED: DHS Changes Are Just the Curtain-Raiser for DoD

 

Due to a mixup, yesterday's FEDERAL PERSONNEL GUIDE NEWS UPDATE carried a misleading subject line. We are retransmitting it with the correct subject line. We apologize for any confusion.

This news update is brought to you by the FEDERAL PERSONNEL GUIDE (
www.fedguide.com). No longer interested? No problem. To be removed from this mailing list, just follow the instructions at the bottom of this message.

Last week we detailed proposed pay and labor relations changes at  the Dept. of Homeland Security. DHS is significant because it's the first big agency to propose major civil service changes post-9/11. And DHS is very large, with some 180,000 employees.

But the changes at the Defense Dept. (DoD) would be even more significant -- because they'd affect so many more civilian federal employees. DHS and DoD together employ about
half the civilian Federal workforce.

DoD isn't as far along as DHS, but here's what we know so far --

-- NO CHANGE UNTIL NEW FISCAL YEAR. After first saying "June," DoD now expects the conversion to begin after
Oct. 1, 2004, the start of the new fiscal year.

-- RULES ON REHIRING ANNUITANTS could come early. DoD wants to clear away salary-offset stumbling-blocks.

-- OPPOSITION IS GROWING. DoD will need several more months to draft new labor relations provisions. Union opposition is growing fast, and some in Congress are edgy too, because DoD's expected draft would cut heavily into collective bargaining rights. Provisions are expected to include --

  -- Union appeals of labor-management disputes to be decided
     by a new internal DoD board, instead of FLRA, as at present.
  -- Employee appeals of personnel actions to be decided by a
     new internal DoD board with MSPB review, instead of MSPB
     alone, as at present.
  -- National bargaining units would replace some of the 1,344
     units covering 410,810 DoD employees that were empowered
     to bargain with DoD as of 2001.
  -- In bargaining-unit elections, a majority of unit members
     would be required to vote and the union would have to
     receive a majority of votes cast. Presently, 30% of
     bargaining unit members must agree to elections.